New entrants in the market with low market share often receive a mix of better and worse reviews compared to established players, depending on various factors such as innovation, price positioning, expectations, and brand perception.

Here’s a breakdown of why this happens:

1. Lower Expectations Can Lead to Positive Surprises

  • Positive Bias from Lower Expectations: New entrants generally face lower consumer expectations because they lack the long-standing reputation of established players. When a new brand delivers a quality product that exceeds expectations, reviews tend to be more favorable because consumers and reviewers are often pleasantly surprised.

    • Example: OnePlus, when it first entered the smartphone market, received glowing reviews for offering high-end specs at a much lower price than established brands like Apple and Samsung, impressing users with its value.

  • Room for Innovation: New entrants often come with fresh ideas or innovative features that established players may overlook. This innovation is frequently highlighted in reviews, especially if the product solves a specific problem or introduces a new concept.

    • Example: Tesla, when it entered the electric vehicle market, was lauded for its innovation, particularly in battery technology and software, which led to highly positive reviews compared to traditional automakers.

2. Scrutiny Due to Lack of Brand Trust

  • Skepticism Toward New Brands: Consumers may be more critical of new entrants due to a lack of trust or familiarity with the brand. This skepticism can result in harsher reviews, especially if there are concerns about quality, longevity, or customer support.

    • Example: Nothing, a new player in the tech space founded by Carl Pei, faced some skepticism in reviews of its Ear (1) wireless earbuds, with some reviewers questioning long-term support and reliability compared to brands like Apple or Sony.

  • Concerns Over Longevity: Reviews often reflect concerns over whether the new entrant will continue to support the product with updates, warranty services, or product expansions. This is especially relevant in industries where long-term reliability and customer service are important, such as tech or automotive.

    • Example: When Fairphone launched its sustainable smartphones, reviews praised its ethical approach, but some expressed doubt about the company’s ability to deliver on long-term software updates and spare parts compared to more established brands like Samsung.

3. Price-Performance Ratio

  • Better Reviews for Affordable Products: New entrants often adopt competitive pricing strategies to gain market share, which can lead to favorable reviews when the price-to-performance ratio is seen as a great value. If a product offers comparable or superior features at a lower price than established competitors, it tends to earn positive feedback.
    • Example: Xiaomi and Realme initially received rave reviews for offering budget-friendly smartphones with specs that rivaled more expensive models from Apple or Samsung. Reviewers praised the value they brought to the table.
  • Negative Reviews for Overpricing: If a new entrant prices its products too high without offering sufficient differentiation or value compared to market leaders, reviews can be more negative. Consumers often expect new brands to be more affordable or offer better value as they are not yet established.
    • Example: When Google launched its Pixelbook, the device was priced similarly to premium Apple and Windows laptops, but reviews were mixed because many felt the pricing was not justified, given Google’s lack of a strong presence in the laptop market.

AfriPrime App link:  FREE to download...

https://www.amazon.com/Africircle-AfriPrime/dp/B0D2M3F2JT

4. Innovation and Niche Appeal

  • Positive Reviews for Innovation: New entrants that introduce innovative features or target a niche audience often receive better reviews, especially if they address needs that established players overlook. This can result in enthusiastic praise from early adopters and tech enthusiasts.
    • Example: DJI, when it entered the drone market, received glowing reviews for its innovative, user-friendly consumer drones, which were viewed as more accessible than existing drones from other companies.
  • Negative Reviews for Lack of Differentiation: If a new entrant doesn’t bring anything new to the table or simply mimics the features of established brands without significant innovation, reviews can be more critical. Reviewers expect new players to offer something distinct, whether through price, features, or design.
    • Example: Some new smartphone brands, particularly in the Android space, have received lackluster reviews for offering devices that look and feel too similar to more established brands like Samsung, without adding much in the way of innovation.

5. Support and Ecosystem

  • Better Reviews for Unique or Disruptive Ecosystems: New entrants that introduce a unique ecosystem or integration with other products often get positive reviews, especially if their ecosystem is seen as easier to use or more accessible than those of established players.

    • Example: Sonos received high praise for creating an easy-to-use multi-room wireless speaker system that challenged more complex and expensive setups from traditional audio brands, earning strong reviews for its disruptive approach.

  • Negative Reviews for Lack of Ecosystem: Established brands often have well-developed ecosystems (e.g., app stores, services, accessories) that enhance the user experience. New entrants, especially in tech, can receive lower reviews if their products don’t integrate well with other devices or services, or if they lack a comparable ecosystem.

    • Example: Windows Phone struggled to compete with iOS and Android ecosystems, and despite some positive reviews for its interface, it often received negative feedback for its lack of app support and integration with other services.

6. Brand Loyalty and Bias

  • Lack of Brand Loyalty: Established players often benefit from a strong base of loyal customers who are willing to give the brand the benefit of the doubt. New entrants don’t have this loyalty, and as a result, they may not receive as favorable reviews, even if the product is solid.

    • Example: Samsung Galaxy smartphones tend to have loyal users who may overlook minor issues in reviews, whereas a new brand without that following might be judged more harshly for similar flaws.

  • Positive Bias Toward Disruption: On the flip side, new entrants that challenge the status quo and position themselves as disruptors can gain positive attention from reviewers and consumers who are eager for alternatives to the established players.

    • Example: Tidal, a new entrant in the music streaming market, received positive reviews for its focus on high-fidelity sound and artist-centered business model, challenging Spotify’s dominance.

7. Marketing and Media Influence

  • Hype and Early Positive Reviews: New entrants that generate a lot of hype through effective marketing or association with influential founders may receive better initial reviews, as early adopters and tech media are eager to try something new. These reviews can be driven by excitement rather than long-term use.
    • Example: Nothing's Ear (1) wireless earbuds received a lot of initial praise thanks to its unique design and association with OnePlus co-founder Carl Pei, despite being a new player in a competitive market.
  • Critical Reviews as the Hype Fades: As the novelty wears off, new entrants may face more critical reviews if the product doesn’t live up to the initial hype. Long-term reviews tend to be more grounded, focusing on real-world performance, support, and reliability.
    • Example: After the initial excitement around Tesla’s Model 3, more critical reviews emerged as users encountered issues with build quality, customer service, and software bugs, showing that hype can sometimes overshadow early flaws.

Conclusion

Whether new entrants in the market receive better or worse reviews compared to established players depends on a variety of factors:

  • Better reviews tend to come when new entrants exceed expectations, deliver innovation, offer great value, or solve problems that established brands overlook. Lower initial expectations also work in their favor, with consumers and reviewers often pleasantly surprised by their performance.
  • Worse reviews occur when new entrants face skepticism over their reliability, long-term support, or lack of a developed ecosystem. They are also more critically judged if they fail to differentiate themselves from established players or if they price their products too high without delivering comparable value.

In short, new entrants can succeed in receiving better reviews if they can bring something new to the table, but they must also overcome the challenges of limited brand recognition, trust, and ecosystem support to maintain favorable feedback over time.

AfriPrime App link:  FREE to download...

https://www.amazon.com/Africircle-AfriPrime/dp/B0D2M3F2JT