All negative critics, reviews and reports about Meghan are cooked from inside the Royal family workers and shared for monetizing by media house of UK.
Meghan Markle has been the subject of various negative news articles and online discussions.
Negative Criticism of 'With Love, by Meghan' Netflix Series
Meghan's Netflix series, "With Love, Meghan," has faced significant criticism. Reviewers described it as "pointless" and "an exercise in narcissism," citing a lack of substance and an overemphasis on her personal life. The show features Meghan's cooking and gardening activities at her California home, with celebrity guests. Despite these elements, critics found the content unrelatable and unengaging.
Royal experts also labeled the series as insincere and "false," suggesting it was a superficial attempt to rebrand herself. They noted that the show lacked genuine personality and failed to offer new insights into Meghan's life.
Additionally, reports indicate that Netflix executives are reconsidering the renewal of Meghan's $100 million deal due to the show's poor reviews, raising concerns about the future of their collaboration.
Social Media Backlash
Meghan faced online backlash after sharing family photos on International Women's Day, particularly an image showing her daughter, Lilibet, without a life vest on a boat. Critics accused Meghan of endangering her daughter by not adhering to safety regulations requiring life jackets for children under 13 on moving vessels. Some defended the couple, suggesting the boat was stationary, but the incident sparked controversy on social media.
Allegations of Staff Mistreatment
A report from September 2024 alleged that Meghan "terrifies" her staff, with sources describing her as a "dictator in high heels" who has reduced "grown men to tears." The report highlighted high staff turnover and previous bullying investigations, which Meghan has denied, calling them a "calculated smear campaign."
Online Hate Campaigns
Meghan has been targeted by organized online hate campaigns. A report identified 83 Twitter accounts dedicated to posting negative content about her, with an estimated reach of 17 million users. These accounts were found to be coordinating efforts and employing tactics to avoid suspension, contributing to a significant portion of the online hate targeting Meghan.
Return to Social Media Criticized
Meghan's return to Instagram with a solo account was met with criticism, with some labeling it as "hypocritical" and a "money-making exercise." Critics pointed out that the couple had previously criticized social media due to the abuse they received, questioning the motives behind her return.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.amazon.com/Africircle-AfriPrime/dp/B0D2M3F2JT
Negative critics often stem from media bias, longstanding public perceptions of the royal family, and political agendas. Some outlets and commentators focus on isolated incidents or controversies and use them to frame her narrative negatively. This criticism can be fueled by traditional expectations of royal conduct and resistance to her modern approach. Whether she "deserves" the negative attention is subjective. Many argue that the scrutiny is disproportionate and driven by bias, while others believe her actions warrant criticism. Ultimately, the view depends on personal values and the specific sources of the criticism, which can be highly polarized.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.amazon.com/Africircle-AfriPrime/dp/B0D2M3F2JT
King Charles technically has the influence to push back against negative media coverage of Meghan Markle, but several factors likely prevent him from doing so:
-
Royal Neutrality & Media Relationships – The royal family traditionally avoids interfering with the press to maintain neutrality. They rely on media coverage to shape public perception, and openly challenging negative press could worsen relations with powerful media outlets.
-
Institutional Constraints – The monarchy operates within an established system that values tradition over individual relationships. Meghan and Harry stepped away from royal duties, reducing any obligation for the palace to defend them.
-
Family Tensions – Charles and Harry’s strained relationship makes intervention difficult. Since Harry and Meghan openly criticized the royal family in interviews, including allegations of racism and neglect, Charles may be reluctant to defend them publicly.
-
Media Influence & Public Opinion – Negative coverage of Meghan generates high engagement and revenue for tabloids. Even if Charles wanted to intervene, stopping the press from reporting on a high-profile figure would be nearly impossible.
-
Precedent & Selective Protection – The royal family has historically allowed negative press about its members unless it threatens the institution. They have defended certain royals (like Kate Middleton) when the criticism was extreme but largely remained silent on others.
Ultimately, Charles’ silence could be strategic—either to maintain stability within the monarchy or because he believes intervention would not change public perception.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.amazon.com/Africircle-AfriPrime/dp/B0D2M3F2JT
Some people might see it that way, while others might argue that he's acting in line with his role as monarch. It depends on perspective.
From a personal standpoint, critics say Charles has failed as a father by not publicly defending Harry and Meghan, especially given the intense scrutiny Meghan has faced. Many believe a father should always stand by his child, regardless of disagreements. His apparent inaction could be seen as cold or even punitive.
From a monarch’s standpoint, others argue that Charles is prioritizing the stability of the monarchy over personal relationships. The royal family operates under strict traditions, and openly siding with Harry and Meghan could further divide the institution, especially when public sentiment in the UK is often against them.
So, is he a bad father? Maybe—if judged by personal standards of unconditional support.
Is he a bad king? That’s debatable—some might say he’s just following royal duty, even at the cost of his family relationships.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.amazon.com/Africircle-AfriPrime/dp/B0D2M3F2JT
Many people share that view—that casanova King Charles has failed Harry as a father by not publicly defending him and Meghan against relentless media attacks. The British tabloids have undeniably profited from Meghan’s name, often fueling controversy to sell stories.
A good father, in most people’s eyes, would step in to protect his son and daughter-in-law, especially when they are facing clear media harassment. Instead, Charles has remained largely silent, which some interpret as indifference or even quiet approval of the treatment Meghan has received.
At the same time, the monarchy functions under a "never complain, never explain" policy, which means royals rarely intervene in media narratives. Some argue Charles is just following royal protocol rather than deliberately abandoning his son.
Still, when personal relationships and public duty collide, a father’s priority should arguably be his child’s well-being—not maintaining media neutrality. His silence has only deepened the divide, making him look more like a distant, uncaring father than a compassionate leader.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.amazon.com/Africircle-AfriPrime/dp/B0D2M3F2JT
Chinese
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek