• Smart Watch at Best Price Online in Dubai
    https://uae.sharafdg.com/smart-watches/
    Shop smart watch from top brands like Apple, Huawei, Samsung, Garmin, XCell, Amazefit, Fossil, Haino teko for Mens, Kids & Ladies at best price in Dubai online only at Sharaf DG UAE starting from AED 28
    Smart Watch at Best Price Online in Dubai https://uae.sharafdg.com/smart-watches/ Shop smart watch from top brands like Apple, Huawei, Samsung, Garmin, XCell, Amazefit, Fossil, Haino teko for Mens, Kids & Ladies at best price in Dubai online only at Sharaf DG UAE starting from AED 28
    0 Comments 0 Shares 310 Views
  • An Airbus 380 ✈ is on its way across the Atlantic. It flies consistently at 800 km/h at 30,000 feet. When suddenly a Eurofighter with a Tempo Mach 2 appears!

    The pilot of the fighter jet slows down, flies alongside the Airbus, and greets the pilot of the passenger plane by radio: "Airbus, boring flight isn’t it? Now have a look here!"

    He rolls his jet on its back, accelerates, breaks through the sound barrier, rises rapidly to a dizzying height, and then swoops down almost to sea level in a breathtaking dive. ✈ He loops back next to the Airbus and asks: "Well, how was that?" 🛩

    The Airbus pilot answers: "Very impressive, but watch this!"

    The jet pilot watches the Airbus, but nothing happens. It continues to fly straight, at the same speed. After 15 minutes, the Airbus pilot radios, "Well, how was that?"

    Confused, the jet pilot asks, "What did you do?"

    The AirBus pilot laughs and says: "I got up, stretched my legs, walked to the back of the aircraft to use the washroom, then got a cup of coffee and a chocolate fudge pastry."

    The moral of the story is: When you’re young, speed and adrenaline seem great. But as you get older and wiser, you learn that comfort and peace are more important. ✌

    This is called S.O.S.: Slower, Older, and Smarter.

    Dedicated to all my senior friends ~ it’s time to slow down and enjoy the rest of the trip. #LifeLessons #AgeWisdom
    An Airbus 380 ✈ is on its way across the Atlantic. It flies consistently at 800 km/h at 30,000 feet. When suddenly a Eurofighter with a Tempo Mach 2 appears! The pilot of the fighter jet slows down, flies alongside the Airbus, and greets the pilot of the passenger plane by radio: "Airbus, boring flight isn’t it? Now have a look here!" He rolls his jet on its back, accelerates, breaks through the sound barrier, rises rapidly to a dizzying height, and then swoops down almost to sea level in a breathtaking dive. 😱✈ He loops back next to the Airbus and asks: "Well, how was that?" 🛩 The Airbus pilot answers: "Very impressive, but watch this!" The jet pilot watches the Airbus, but nothing happens. It continues to fly straight, at the same speed. After 15 minutes, the Airbus pilot radios, "Well, how was that?" Confused, the jet pilot asks, "What did you do?" The AirBus pilot laughs and says: "I got up, stretched my legs, walked to the back of the aircraft to use the washroom, then got a cup of coffee and a chocolate fudge pastry." ☕🍫 The moral of the story is: When you’re young, speed and adrenaline seem great. But as you get older and wiser, you learn that comfort and peace are more important. ✌🌅 This is called S.O.S.: Slower, Older, and Smarter. 🧘‍♂️🧠 Dedicated to all my senior friends ~ it’s time to slow down and enjoy the rest of the trip. 🤗❤ #LifeLessons #AgeWisdom
    0 Comments 0 Shares 757 Views
  • Establishing Trust-
    The challenging process of a client's wariness.
    Reviewed by Jessica Schrader

    KEY POINTS-
    Clients' trust in the process of therapy—and in their therapists—underlies the healing they seek.
    Being attuned to a client's past trust issues informs the work you do with them.
    It is important to find ways to navigate clients' struggles with trust.
    Underlying the concerns our clients bring to therapy, perhaps the most crucial task they face is establishing trust: trust that they can heal their psychological/emotional wounds, trust that counseling has something useful to offer, and trust in themselves as they move toward a fuller sense of self.

    Stefano* doesn’t trust me at all when he first arrives at my office. A difficult childhood where he was both ignored and gaslit by his parents means he starts out being polite and deferential during sessions. His eyes remain wary, though—constantly darting to the bookcase to his left, or the window view behind me. Stefano says he wants to feel more "connected" in his life (to his wife, his child, his work, and to himself), and I think about the link between vulnerability (requiring trust) and connection. Therapy represents a huge risk for him; as he begins to trust me a little, he becomes more vocal about his doubts and challenges me with more verbal forcefulness:

    “I don’t mean to argue, but how do you know I should have been raised with more kindness?”

    “Ok, but if I let people know me, I might get hurt. You must see that!”

    One day, he took the risk to ask, “I pay you to listen to me ... how do I know you actually care about me?” His voice was choked with emotion and vulnerability, and I knew he'd reached a pivotal moment of trying to trust.

    Stefano’s direct, raw resistance to trusting is so very congruent with all the questions he never got to ask growing up, and all the challenging he never got to do. If I push him to move more quickly toward trusting me (or the therapeutic process), he would most likely back away. It isn’t easy to feel so consistently challenged, but I understand the purpose behind it. I stay engaged and responsive as I watch Stefano sort out layers and layers of uncertainty.

    In more than 40 years of working with clients, I’m moved by their struggle to trust. Whether they’re struggling to trust me, the therapeutic process, or themselves, it’s a powerful process of reckoning. Each client’s unique journey toward trust has my utmost respect.

    Samantha is wary for different reasons. A 32-year-old single mom, she describes a previous counseling experience where the therapist consistently made strong declarations regarding Samantha and her needs. “If I told her that her perspective wasn’t quite how I saw things, she’d get defensive, and explain her point of view—again. It was like she needed to be right, and I was there to accept her take on things.” In that dynamic, Samantha’s confidence in herself slowly faded.

    During sessions, Samantha watches me like a hawk and I’m careful to defer to her as the “expert” on what is true for her—even when she frames a situation slightly differently than I might frame it.

    “You’re the expert on you,” I tell her. “I can offer my take on things, but it’s important that you listen to what feels true for you. Don’t believe me. Believe yourself.”

    At one point, she chuckles when I say this, and says, “You always say that.”

    “And I always mean it,” I reply. With this exchange, I know she is nearly free of the mistrust she’s carried.

    While clients establish a sense of trust in themselves (or in me), I rely on an abiding trust in myself. If a client doesn’t agree with my perspective, that’s fine. I know we can get “there” a different way or at a different time. I can hold my ground when I think it’s useful—but it’s essential to hold it in a deeply neutral, clean manner that doesn’t trigger a power struggle or a damaging kind of self-doubt for the client. I want to stay curious, engaged, and willing to be wrong.

    Trust might not happen, no matter how hard I try. I can miss a cue as to what the client needs or misunderstand the way they communicate their needs; I can "drop the ball" at an inopportune moment or fail to meet them as fully as they need. In those instances, the door to trust can swing closed. (If I’m skillful enough, I might be able to repair these sorts of "gaps.") Rather than being right, I need to deeply trust my capacity for listening, compassion, and curiosity, asking the client to help me piece together a useful lens for working with their concerns.

    These questions might help you explore the process of trust in therapy:
    How do you respond to clients’ mistrust as they begin the process of therapy? Do you talk about it with clients? How do you notice/stay aware of their trust issues?
    In your clinical training, what kinds of support or input did you receive with regard to dealing with clients’ trust issues?
    Are there times when a client’s distrust is hard for you? What response gets triggered in you?
    Do you remember times when you personally struggled with learning to trust in new ways? What was most helpful in finding your way through that?

    *All names have been changed for privacy considerations.
    Establishing Trust- The challenging process of a client's wariness. Reviewed by Jessica Schrader KEY POINTS- Clients' trust in the process of therapy—and in their therapists—underlies the healing they seek. Being attuned to a client's past trust issues informs the work you do with them. It is important to find ways to navigate clients' struggles with trust. Underlying the concerns our clients bring to therapy, perhaps the most crucial task they face is establishing trust: trust that they can heal their psychological/emotional wounds, trust that counseling has something useful to offer, and trust in themselves as they move toward a fuller sense of self. Stefano* doesn’t trust me at all when he first arrives at my office. A difficult childhood where he was both ignored and gaslit by his parents means he starts out being polite and deferential during sessions. His eyes remain wary, though—constantly darting to the bookcase to his left, or the window view behind me. Stefano says he wants to feel more "connected" in his life (to his wife, his child, his work, and to himself), and I think about the link between vulnerability (requiring trust) and connection. Therapy represents a huge risk for him; as he begins to trust me a little, he becomes more vocal about his doubts and challenges me with more verbal forcefulness: “I don’t mean to argue, but how do you know I should have been raised with more kindness?” “Ok, but if I let people know me, I might get hurt. You must see that!” One day, he took the risk to ask, “I pay you to listen to me ... how do I know you actually care about me?” His voice was choked with emotion and vulnerability, and I knew he'd reached a pivotal moment of trying to trust. Stefano’s direct, raw resistance to trusting is so very congruent with all the questions he never got to ask growing up, and all the challenging he never got to do. If I push him to move more quickly toward trusting me (or the therapeutic process), he would most likely back away. It isn’t easy to feel so consistently challenged, but I understand the purpose behind it. I stay engaged and responsive as I watch Stefano sort out layers and layers of uncertainty. In more than 40 years of working with clients, I’m moved by their struggle to trust. Whether they’re struggling to trust me, the therapeutic process, or themselves, it’s a powerful process of reckoning. Each client’s unique journey toward trust has my utmost respect. Samantha is wary for different reasons. A 32-year-old single mom, she describes a previous counseling experience where the therapist consistently made strong declarations regarding Samantha and her needs. “If I told her that her perspective wasn’t quite how I saw things, she’d get defensive, and explain her point of view—again. It was like she needed to be right, and I was there to accept her take on things.” In that dynamic, Samantha’s confidence in herself slowly faded. During sessions, Samantha watches me like a hawk and I’m careful to defer to her as the “expert” on what is true for her—even when she frames a situation slightly differently than I might frame it. “You’re the expert on you,” I tell her. “I can offer my take on things, but it’s important that you listen to what feels true for you. Don’t believe me. Believe yourself.” At one point, she chuckles when I say this, and says, “You always say that.” “And I always mean it,” I reply. With this exchange, I know she is nearly free of the mistrust she’s carried. While clients establish a sense of trust in themselves (or in me), I rely on an abiding trust in myself. If a client doesn’t agree with my perspective, that’s fine. I know we can get “there” a different way or at a different time. I can hold my ground when I think it’s useful—but it’s essential to hold it in a deeply neutral, clean manner that doesn’t trigger a power struggle or a damaging kind of self-doubt for the client. I want to stay curious, engaged, and willing to be wrong. Trust might not happen, no matter how hard I try. I can miss a cue as to what the client needs or misunderstand the way they communicate their needs; I can "drop the ball" at an inopportune moment or fail to meet them as fully as they need. In those instances, the door to trust can swing closed. (If I’m skillful enough, I might be able to repair these sorts of "gaps.") Rather than being right, I need to deeply trust my capacity for listening, compassion, and curiosity, asking the client to help me piece together a useful lens for working with their concerns. These questions might help you explore the process of trust in therapy: How do you respond to clients’ mistrust as they begin the process of therapy? Do you talk about it with clients? How do you notice/stay aware of their trust issues? In your clinical training, what kinds of support or input did you receive with regard to dealing with clients’ trust issues? Are there times when a client’s distrust is hard for you? What response gets triggered in you? Do you remember times when you personally struggled with learning to trust in new ways? What was most helpful in finding your way through that? *All names have been changed for privacy considerations.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 517 Views
  • Solving the Pandemic After the Pandemic-
    Long COVID affects millions. It illustrates the need for a new medical paradigm.
    Reviewed by Tyler Woods

    KEY POINTS-
    Long COVID research has been pioneered by patients, with the medical establishment playing catch-up.
    A new paradigm for patient-centered health care is emerging, emboldened by new technological advances.
    A new bottom-up approach for pursuing research could transform care for many hard-to-treat diseases.
    We now stand at the meeting of two eternities, to borrow a line from Henry David Thoreau: the past and future.

    That is the present moment.
    On May 11, the Biden administration is slated to end the public health emergency for the COVID-19 pandemic. But although certain government services will end, the virus won't stop replicating and spreading, and its long-term effects on our immune systems still carry the same level of risk.

    For tens of millions of people around the world, "the pandemic after the pandemic" is well underway.

    Study after study shows that 10 to 30 percent of those infected with COVID-19 go on to develop symptoms of long COVID, including debilitating fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and brain fog, among as many as 200 other symptoms. A study from Harvard economist David Cutler estimates the long-term economic toll of long COVID at $3.7 trillion in the U.S. alone, a number that is on par with the Great Recession.

    In shifting to this new phase of the pandemic, it's essential to refocus an all-of-society endeavor to offer treatments, services, and support for COVID long-haulers to preserve their dignity and their dreams.

    As a society, we have always rallied to visions at the frontiers of the imagination: staring down the totalitarian menace in Europe during World War II, landing on the moon, and developing a vaccine in record time to quell the tide of a global pandemic. That's the magic of thinking big.

    But just as we developed public-private vaccine distribution through Operation Warp Speed, we need a similarly ambitious set of policies to reckon with the long tail of the virus, how it's etched itself into the lives of tens of millions around the world in myriad ways seen and unseen. Many have debilitating symptoms that never left them after their infection; others carry invisible organ damage that leaves them vulnerable to sudden heart attacks or strokes years from now.

    We need an Operation Warp Speed for long COVID.
    As the public health emergency is set to end, there is no more important time in a generation to be evaluating how many important lessons the pandemic has taught us about ourselves and society, and how we can leverage this moment toward a new, better normal for science and health equity. So far, innovative patient groups were the first to research and write "the first textbook on long COVID," as the Los Angeles Times put it.

    What they’ve taught us is a method for rethinking biomedicine more broadly and pursuing cures across all diseases.

    Reinventing medicine, with patients at the center
    In short, we may need an entirely new paradigm for how we think about medicine.

    The idea of a "paradigm shift" was coined by philosopher Thomas Kuhn, in his book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. At inflection points in history, new ways of gathering or processing or even thinking about data radically rewrite the rules of the scientific enterprise itself.

    New technology has spurred breathtaking new revolutions from the Human Genome Project, advances in supercomputing and big data, blockchain and Web 3.0, and most recently the blossoming possibilities of generative AI. Patients are likewise empowered in ways never seen in human history: we can use social media to form support groups across the globe while ill in bed, we can build our own patient registries to partner with research labs, and can generate our own data through smart watches, Oura rings, or other wearable devices. And new platforms even enable us to organize our own clinical trials.

    All these changes add up to the full coming-of-age for precision medicine. This personalized approach is becoming more accessible to every man, woman, and child, with costs falling exponentially, and access to these technologies available through the iPhone in your pocket.

    This new paradigm can and should be a patient-centered paradigm.

    From a different vantage point, that was also the message from Psychology Today editor-at-large Hara Marano, after she wrote a harrowing feature story delving into the depths of physician burnout, and how it was leading higher rates of suicide among people who had dedicated their lives to health care.

    But in their own way, the healers are hurting as much as the sick. Doctors allocate their time into 15-minute appointments, becoming cogs in a machine meant to fully optimize bureaucratic “relative value units” rather than to connect with a fellow human being in need. Constrained by the system, this leads to what’s called "moral injury." That’s when an individual is compelled to respond to or witness a system that runs contrary to their own ethical beliefs.

    Studies from the American Medical Association show that 80 percent of physicians report burnout, and suicide rates among doctors outpace those in the general population. In short, a failure to embrace this more human-centered frame puts not just patients’ lives at risk, but physicians' lives as well.

    But most importantly, forging a more humane way of thinking for doctors and patients can liberate all of us.

    Welcome to the Revolution
    In this new column, "Patient Revolution," I'll be chronicling these stories at the front lines of science and democracy. It's a breathtaking time to be alive, to be a science writer, and to have a foothold in helping forge the next generation of policies that can improve the lives of potentially billions of people around the world.

    I'm excited to share the first volley of stories: in the coming weeks, I'll delve more into the movement to treat long COVID, the tales of those who laid the groundwork for the patient-led movement, and the stories of communities who are forging the new paradigm in medicine.

    The human need is being met by patient entrepreneurs with long COVID who are creating new apps to track and manage symptoms, generating bottom-up solutions with patients rightfully claiming the mantle of true expertise. We'll explore how the Biden administration's new long COVID health report lays out a roadmap to use long COVID as a catalyst to roll out human-centered design principles across the health care system.

    COVID long-haulers are just the latest example of how patients have harnessed emerging technologies to take back their own agency in medicine. I'll take you into some seminal experiences over the past decade through the Stanford Medicine X community with dozens of "ePatient Scholars"—such as a philosopher with brain cancer and a quadriplegic artist with multiple sclerosis—all challenged the health system to be better. I'll also peel back the curtain on my own creative process: I chronicled patients’ quest to change health care forever in my book The Long Haul. But it’s often not enough to just be a journalist covering the story. Stories cry out for action, and should compel us to roll our sleeves up to be part of the solution. I want every would-be creator to make their writing or art part of their own vision for their own future success or for inaugurating a better world.

    These stories are constantly unfolding, across disease and discipline and demographic. The Wall Street Journal's Amy Dockser Marcus recently published the book We The Scientists, illustrating how families with children afflicted by the rare and deadly Niemann-Pick disease organized clinical trials to race toward a cure. Those families were pursuing their game-changing work, just as Brian Wallach, an alum of the Obama '08 campaign, was being diagnosed with ALS, the same terminal disease that felled baseball great Lou Gehrig and physicist Stephen Hawking. Determined to change that trajectory for himself and thousands of future patients, Wallach decided to tackle his medical care like a presidential campaign, galvanizing ALS advocates and leading toward a landmark $100 million bill signed into law that could transform ALS treatments. As Politico put it in a headline, "He was given six months to live. Then he changed DC." I believe that these sorts of moments can become the norm, rather than the exception.

    At every step, this patient-led innovation requires relentless optimism, constant drive, and an unyielding audacity to change our own lives.

    "If you hang out with the cowboys and the rebels and the pioneers, you will see the future faster," says Susannah Fox, a former chief technology officer for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the author of an upcoming book called Rebel Health.

    Come hang out with me. And let's go see the future together.
    Solving the Pandemic After the Pandemic- Long COVID affects millions. It illustrates the need for a new medical paradigm. Reviewed by Tyler Woods KEY POINTS- Long COVID research has been pioneered by patients, with the medical establishment playing catch-up. A new paradigm for patient-centered health care is emerging, emboldened by new technological advances. A new bottom-up approach for pursuing research could transform care for many hard-to-treat diseases. We now stand at the meeting of two eternities, to borrow a line from Henry David Thoreau: the past and future. That is the present moment. On May 11, the Biden administration is slated to end the public health emergency for the COVID-19 pandemic. But although certain government services will end, the virus won't stop replicating and spreading, and its long-term effects on our immune systems still carry the same level of risk. For tens of millions of people around the world, "the pandemic after the pandemic" is well underway. Study after study shows that 10 to 30 percent of those infected with COVID-19 go on to develop symptoms of long COVID, including debilitating fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and brain fog, among as many as 200 other symptoms. A study from Harvard economist David Cutler estimates the long-term economic toll of long COVID at $3.7 trillion in the U.S. alone, a number that is on par with the Great Recession. In shifting to this new phase of the pandemic, it's essential to refocus an all-of-society endeavor to offer treatments, services, and support for COVID long-haulers to preserve their dignity and their dreams. As a society, we have always rallied to visions at the frontiers of the imagination: staring down the totalitarian menace in Europe during World War II, landing on the moon, and developing a vaccine in record time to quell the tide of a global pandemic. That's the magic of thinking big. But just as we developed public-private vaccine distribution through Operation Warp Speed, we need a similarly ambitious set of policies to reckon with the long tail of the virus, how it's etched itself into the lives of tens of millions around the world in myriad ways seen and unseen. Many have debilitating symptoms that never left them after their infection; others carry invisible organ damage that leaves them vulnerable to sudden heart attacks or strokes years from now. We need an Operation Warp Speed for long COVID. As the public health emergency is set to end, there is no more important time in a generation to be evaluating how many important lessons the pandemic has taught us about ourselves and society, and how we can leverage this moment toward a new, better normal for science and health equity. So far, innovative patient groups were the first to research and write "the first textbook on long COVID," as the Los Angeles Times put it. What they’ve taught us is a method for rethinking biomedicine more broadly and pursuing cures across all diseases. Reinventing medicine, with patients at the center In short, we may need an entirely new paradigm for how we think about medicine. The idea of a "paradigm shift" was coined by philosopher Thomas Kuhn, in his book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. At inflection points in history, new ways of gathering or processing or even thinking about data radically rewrite the rules of the scientific enterprise itself. New technology has spurred breathtaking new revolutions from the Human Genome Project, advances in supercomputing and big data, blockchain and Web 3.0, and most recently the blossoming possibilities of generative AI. Patients are likewise empowered in ways never seen in human history: we can use social media to form support groups across the globe while ill in bed, we can build our own patient registries to partner with research labs, and can generate our own data through smart watches, Oura rings, or other wearable devices. And new platforms even enable us to organize our own clinical trials. All these changes add up to the full coming-of-age for precision medicine. This personalized approach is becoming more accessible to every man, woman, and child, with costs falling exponentially, and access to these technologies available through the iPhone in your pocket. This new paradigm can and should be a patient-centered paradigm. From a different vantage point, that was also the message from Psychology Today editor-at-large Hara Marano, after she wrote a harrowing feature story delving into the depths of physician burnout, and how it was leading higher rates of suicide among people who had dedicated their lives to health care. But in their own way, the healers are hurting as much as the sick. Doctors allocate their time into 15-minute appointments, becoming cogs in a machine meant to fully optimize bureaucratic “relative value units” rather than to connect with a fellow human being in need. Constrained by the system, this leads to what’s called "moral injury." That’s when an individual is compelled to respond to or witness a system that runs contrary to their own ethical beliefs. Studies from the American Medical Association show that 80 percent of physicians report burnout, and suicide rates among doctors outpace those in the general population. In short, a failure to embrace this more human-centered frame puts not just patients’ lives at risk, but physicians' lives as well. But most importantly, forging a more humane way of thinking for doctors and patients can liberate all of us. Welcome to the Revolution In this new column, "Patient Revolution," I'll be chronicling these stories at the front lines of science and democracy. It's a breathtaking time to be alive, to be a science writer, and to have a foothold in helping forge the next generation of policies that can improve the lives of potentially billions of people around the world. I'm excited to share the first volley of stories: in the coming weeks, I'll delve more into the movement to treat long COVID, the tales of those who laid the groundwork for the patient-led movement, and the stories of communities who are forging the new paradigm in medicine. The human need is being met by patient entrepreneurs with long COVID who are creating new apps to track and manage symptoms, generating bottom-up solutions with patients rightfully claiming the mantle of true expertise. We'll explore how the Biden administration's new long COVID health report lays out a roadmap to use long COVID as a catalyst to roll out human-centered design principles across the health care system. COVID long-haulers are just the latest example of how patients have harnessed emerging technologies to take back their own agency in medicine. I'll take you into some seminal experiences over the past decade through the Stanford Medicine X community with dozens of "ePatient Scholars"—such as a philosopher with brain cancer and a quadriplegic artist with multiple sclerosis—all challenged the health system to be better. I'll also peel back the curtain on my own creative process: I chronicled patients’ quest to change health care forever in my book The Long Haul. But it’s often not enough to just be a journalist covering the story. Stories cry out for action, and should compel us to roll our sleeves up to be part of the solution. I want every would-be creator to make their writing or art part of their own vision for their own future success or for inaugurating a better world. These stories are constantly unfolding, across disease and discipline and demographic. The Wall Street Journal's Amy Dockser Marcus recently published the book We The Scientists, illustrating how families with children afflicted by the rare and deadly Niemann-Pick disease organized clinical trials to race toward a cure. Those families were pursuing their game-changing work, just as Brian Wallach, an alum of the Obama '08 campaign, was being diagnosed with ALS, the same terminal disease that felled baseball great Lou Gehrig and physicist Stephen Hawking. Determined to change that trajectory for himself and thousands of future patients, Wallach decided to tackle his medical care like a presidential campaign, galvanizing ALS advocates and leading toward a landmark $100 million bill signed into law that could transform ALS treatments. As Politico put it in a headline, "He was given six months to live. Then he changed DC." I believe that these sorts of moments can become the norm, rather than the exception. At every step, this patient-led innovation requires relentless optimism, constant drive, and an unyielding audacity to change our own lives. "If you hang out with the cowboys and the rebels and the pioneers, you will see the future faster," says Susannah Fox, a former chief technology officer for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the author of an upcoming book called Rebel Health. Come hang out with me. And let's go see the future together.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1894 Views